Archive for the ‘Alexander Gandar’ Category

Pinewood

Wednesday, October 29th, 2008

It’s 8 AM, and I’m on a train to… Uxbridge? Oh. Somewhere in Buckinghamshire. I’m going to Pinewood Studios. How exciting! This is a reasonably late start for production, I know, but I’m still a bit bleary.

I’m working as a production runner on the third series of The IT Crowd. Having never been to Pinewood before it’s become something of a myth in my brain, populated with celebrities suckling on peeled grapes in their house-sized trailers while the teamsters smoke cigarettes outside enormous corrugated soundstage doors and buggies maniacally zoom directors from office to set.

I’m not far off.

Well. I am. But it’s a nebulous sprawl of a place, that’s a fact, and everyone still seems to be buzzing from having the latest 007 production in residence. Currently the big man on campus is Prince Of Persia and a lot of the supporting artists I talk to have worked on that as well.

I get through to lunch, and realize I’m having a blast. Pinewood is FUN, I think to myself, grinning like a lunatic as I sprint across a car-park trying not to slosh any of the six coffees I’m juggling over my skinny wrists. Then I stop grinning, because I look like a lunatic. But still. I don’t know if I really expected to have fun!
Because:
a) The last time I was on a multi-camera TV set was as an actor, and the runners never really looked like they were enjoying themselves too much, all frazzled eyes as they frantically checked their pockets for the last receipt they might have forgotten to get and furiously scribbled down dinner orders.

b) Most of us have been there, and while obviously as much an integral part of the structure as any other on-set job, I think it’s fair to say that being a runner is, well, a bit mindless.
Sometimes mindless is nice, and thankfully one is manic enough not to worry about it, or even to concoct this blog, which is scribbled on the long train back from Uxbridge after an even longer day (14 hours? I think?). Hence the scatter-brain. Here’s to sleep, and here’s to next time.

Alex

Speaking of Shorts

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008

Fact: Short film is a scary realm. And the Shooting People + BAFTA event: Short Sighted was giving us a whole day of it. We sat there, bleary-Sunday-eyed around large tables, 80 or so filmmakers – directors, writers, producers, directors/writers, writers/producers, directors/writers/producers – just waiting for a hit. A straight shot of information. And thus we were given. Problems? Bring ‘em. Questions? Ask ‘em. And so on.

Despite my occasional ambivalence with days like this – the warming community aspect weighed against everyone plonking on about just how HARD it is to get a film made – there were definite highlights. The panel on New Distribution Channels, which examined how video-on-demand and other online platforms have revolutionised the short film market (and will continue to do so), was one, with Katherine Simpson (Current TV), Vivi Mellegard (Babelgum), Digby Lewis (Dailymotion) and Chris Tidman (Shorts International) all demonstrating their chops. We’re all in the dark when it comes to online! It’s true! Nobody really knows anything! Perhaps Ben Blaine (of Blaine Brothers repute) had possibly the best question of the day when he quipped “There are so MANY of you now. Are we in a VHS/Betamax situation? Should I just hold my breath until you all just DIE?” Apparently not.

Perhaps Tidman summed it up best when on an earlier panel he remarked that the supply of short films far outweighs the demand, and this doesn’t seem likely to change in a hurry. No surprises, but maybe it’s not as bleak as it sounds. Short film has never been a lucrative enterprise and never will be, and so as long as these businesses are sustainable and championing the cause, then it would seem that no-one loses.

So, for all my aforementioned inner conflict – a feeling, I’m sure, echoed in others – the overall attitude seemed to be one of hope. Who cares if budgets to make shorts are exponentially smaller than they were a decade ago? So what if I’m rejected from 15 festivals on the trot? It’s no big deal if I’m destitute! Everyone was really saying the same thing at the end of the day: Get the story right, and the rest of it will be just fine.

Alexander Gandar

I’m considering getting business cards made that say “will do anything for money.”

Sunday, September 7th, 2008

This morning I woke up. Late. I had a cup of coffee. Late. I bought the paper. Late. Then I proceeded, with a minimum of effort, to do the largest part of nothing. I’m not lazy. Or retired. Having just wrapped up something of a whirlwind experience in my burgeoning film career (read, fulltime for the BRITDOC Film Festival – anyone who has worked for a festival will know exactly what I mean), I just now find myself in the precious position of being, well, to be blunt: unemployed.

Though, am I? It’s under the guise of holiday, but I wonder if I’ve just been tunnel-festival-vision for so long that perhaps I’ve forgotten what it’s like to live the regular creative dream, hopping from job to job, occasionally surviving on cardboard and mixed nuts, occasionally spending an entire week eating at Cha Cha Moon. This conflict led to a discussion with a friend (a burgeoning and successful filmmaker) in which she cried, “I prefer to call it FREELANCE.”

It’s not about the money. Nobody’s here for it (are they?), and I’m no stranger to the intermittent pay-check. I did the working actor thing, and I definitely will again. What fascinates me more is the euphemistic approach people take. There’s something so bleak surrounding the word ‘unemployed’, it’s a word that implies waiting – and if there’s any no-no in this industry it’s waiting – for the next thing to turn up in your lap. Being ‘freelance’ is just a way of owning your shit.

I just got back from chilling my kicks up in Edinburgh on a writing assignment for the international festival, and I think I might conduct an experiment on behalf of all those sprawled on the living room floor surrounded by the Positions Vacant sections and staving off their Hollyoaks cravings by gorging on Hula Hoops. For half of the next week, whenever anyone asks what I do my answer will be “Oh, me? I’m unemployed.” For the following half the answer will be: “I’m a freelance filmmaker/writer/actor/whichever other profession takes my fancy.” On the seventh day, results will be compiled, relayed, and dissected. Late in the day. Over a cup of coffee. And the paper. Stay tuned.

Losing Touch With Reality

Saturday, July 19th, 2008

A casual Monday or so back I was happily fulfilling that nauseating north-west London stereotype by flicking apathetically through the pages of the media section of The Guardian, when I leafed upon an article that asked respectable television honchos whether The Apprentice should continue after its current season. The jury was hung – two yes, two no. My response was immediately: who cares? (more…)

Documentarians Unite!

Saturday, July 19th, 2008

There’s something mysterious about the word documentary. Often, when people hear it, a little lever is pulled in their brain – the big red one that goes from “on” to “off”. Even an ostensible film fanatic will often start to droop his eyelids at the mention of Errol Morris or Nick Broomfield. The only one to elicit any response is Michael Moore but the man is so hugely divisive that one can’t help but have an opinion, though, hey, at least he re-popularised the form.

This, I have decided, with a Charlie-Brooker-esque gruffness, is an outrage. From whence did this stereotype emerge? Who, what or when is responsible for defaming this intricate, subtle, and varied art? Perhaps it’s television’s fault. We so associate documentary as a televisual form (read: the news) that perhaps it’s no surprise the mode in which we consume television is the same position assumed when people begin discussing documentary: neck loose, torso slouched, seas of flab rolling over a taut belt, legs thrust out at curious angles and a hand creeping subliminally towards the no-no bits. (more…)

To Download or Not To Download

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

Nevermind the question – here’s the answer.

There is something of which we are all technologically guilty. It’s not porn. Well, it might be, depending on your proclivities and your honesty. No, it’s more admissible than that.

Allow me to set a scene. A few people huddle around a laptop as the white light blears up into their pale faces. They are virtually unblinking as the FOX Searchlight logo rolls into the title sequence of Juno. Fine? Well. Juno was only released a day ago at the cinema.

Yet! Despite the persistent rise of cleverly evolving download platforms, still the bigwigs have crawled out and magnanimously announced 2007 as a year of the highest recorded box-office figures. (more…)

Latest Articles

Romeo and Juliet courting via Twitter? Shakespeare would have something to blog about that…

Cross Media projects and the growth of digital technology within theatre is ... (Cross Platform)

How do you put on a show about love at “London’s home of fearless new writing” ?

Think politics, disorder, issues with a capital I. In fact, capitalize the whole bloody word. 503 seems synonymous with topical debate, 2009’s This Much Is True, for example. But can the fearless 503 show its lighter side? (Feature)

Featured Member- Tom Powis

What are your influences? I suppose I am influenced by good theatre. I ... (Feature)

Upcoming Events

Stellar Cafe - Business Principles for Creative Output (15 Nov 2010)

Stellar Cafe: Business Principles for Creative Output

Off The Record: Digital Media (15 Oct 2010)

Off The Record: Established and inspiring industry figures talk informally about their work.  With Q & A.

Stellar Cafe: Writing for Transmedia Projects (15 Sep 2010)

Stellar Cafe: Writing for Transmedia Projects